High-fidelity Production Cost Models are tools for scheduling the operations of power systems, but their computational complexity often necessitates trade-offs in model detail or solution quality. We argue that there are tangible opportunities for resolving this trade-off, or at least mitigating it. To explore this hypothesis, we contribute a holistic approach that simultaneously addresses both model building and solution process. Our model building relies on recent advances in the formulation of Unit Commitment Problems, while our solution processes is based on two novel heuristics (iterative rounding and column generation) that exploit specific attributes of the unit commitment problem. Extensive computational experiments carried out on country-scale grids (Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand) show that iterative rounding achieves substantial speed-ups (up to 10x) while maintaining an average optimality gap of no more than 1% with respect to our benchmark solver (Gurobi). Notably, this heuristic also scales very well with the problem size. Column generation is less successful in terms of runtime, but demonstrate potential for instances characterized by high penetration of renewables. Both heuristics are solver independent, allowing a seamless integration with virtually any mathematical-programming solver. The diverse characteristics of the power systems we experimented on further indicates the generalizability of the proposed heuristics, highlighting their potential to improve the computational efficiency of production cost modeling.

(2025). Bridging theory and practice: Efficiently solving the unit commitment problem in production cost models [journal article - articolo]. In ENERGY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/304185

Bridging theory and practice: Efficiently solving the unit commitment problem in production cost models

Coniglio, Stefano;
2025-01-01

Abstract

High-fidelity Production Cost Models are tools for scheduling the operations of power systems, but their computational complexity often necessitates trade-offs in model detail or solution quality. We argue that there are tangible opportunities for resolving this trade-off, or at least mitigating it. To explore this hypothesis, we contribute a holistic approach that simultaneously addresses both model building and solution process. Our model building relies on recent advances in the formulation of Unit Commitment Problems, while our solution processes is based on two novel heuristics (iterative rounding and column generation) that exploit specific attributes of the unit commitment problem. Extensive computational experiments carried out on country-scale grids (Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand) show that iterative rounding achieves substantial speed-ups (up to 10x) while maintaining an average optimality gap of no more than 1% with respect to our benchmark solver (Gurobi). Notably, this heuristic also scales very well with the problem size. Column generation is less successful in terms of runtime, but demonstrate potential for instances characterized by high penetration of renewables. Both heuristics are solver independent, allowing a seamless integration with virtually any mathematical-programming solver. The diverse characteristics of the power systems we experimented on further indicates the generalizability of the proposed heuristics, highlighting their potential to improve the computational efficiency of production cost modeling.
articolo
2025
Bunnak, Phumthep; Coniglio, Stefano; Galelli, Stefano
(2025). Bridging theory and practice: Efficiently solving the unit commitment problem in production cost models [journal article - articolo]. In ENERGY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/304185
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
2026-ENERGY.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 3.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.69 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/304185
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact