This paper explores the use of the Ultrametric Composite Indicator (UCI) model to construct a hierarchy of composite indicators for assessing corporate sustainability based on the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dimensions. Given the multidimensional nature of sustainability, this study develops a structured hierarchy that shifts from domain-specific indicators to a general composite index, focusing on significant higher-level Composite Indicators (CIs). Using data from 69 publicly listed industrial companies headquartered in one of the 27 countries of the European Union (EU27), with 9 variables belonging to the three subdomains of the ESG, the UCI model returns a hierarchy of 6 composite indicators, which are then compiled by means of the Principal Component Analysis. The preliminary results indicate the presence of two significant higher-level CIs compared to the ones a priori identified. This suggests that in a more extensive study multiple intermediate CIs may be statistically significant. Moreover, this approach can improve the interpretability of the set of CIs, while still respecting the parsimony criterion.
(2025). Exploring the Ultrametric Composite Indicator for Assessing Corporate Sustainability . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/306766
Exploring the Ultrametric Composite Indicator for Assessing Corporate Sustainability
Patelli, Luca;Toninelli, Daniele
2025-01-01
Abstract
This paper explores the use of the Ultrametric Composite Indicator (UCI) model to construct a hierarchy of composite indicators for assessing corporate sustainability based on the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dimensions. Given the multidimensional nature of sustainability, this study develops a structured hierarchy that shifts from domain-specific indicators to a general composite index, focusing on significant higher-level Composite Indicators (CIs). Using data from 69 publicly listed industrial companies headquartered in one of the 27 countries of the European Union (EU27), with 9 variables belonging to the three subdomains of the ESG, the UCI model returns a hierarchy of 6 composite indicators, which are then compiled by means of the Principal Component Analysis. The preliminary results indicate the presence of two significant higher-level CIs compared to the ones a priori identified. This suggests that in a more extensive study multiple intermediate CIs may be statistically significant. Moreover, this approach can improve the interpretability of the set of CIs, while still respecting the parsimony criterion.| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patelli e Toninelli.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
912.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
912.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

