Introduction: Gait impairments are common in People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). Several studies have examined the clinometric properties of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), with LDLJa identified as a robust metric for gait smoothness. However, its responsiveness and interpretability have not been explored. Methods: This cross-sectional study at IRCCS Santa Lucia Hospital enrolled 44 PwMS (age: 28-71; EDSS: 0-6) and 43 age-and gait-speed-matched healthy participants (HP). Two physiotherapists conducted assessments with five synchronized IMUs during a 10-meter walk at participants’ preferred speed. Data were collected at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks of training (T1). Results: Significant differences in log dimensionless jerk (LDLJa) were found between PwMS and HP in the AP (p < 0.001, d = 0.63), ML (p < 0.001, d = 1.08), and CC (p = 0.03, d = 0.68) directions. PwMS had lower LDLJaAP values (<-4.88) and LDLJaML values (<-5.40) with probabilities of 63% and 76%, respectively. ΔLDLJaML demonstrated good responsiveness to rehabilitation (AUC ~0.80), with improvements >4.02% representing the optimal MCID for clinical improvement in MiniBesTest. Conclusion: Lower LDLJa values in the AP and ML directions characterize gait smoothness impairment in PwMS. LDLJa in the ML direction is responsive to balance-focused rehabilitation, highlighting its potential for tracking gait disorders and rehabilitation progress.

(2025). Discriminative ability, responsiveness, and interpretability of smoothness index of gait in people with multiple sclerosis [journal article - articolo]. In ARCHIVES OF PHYSIOTHERAPY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/310105

Discriminative ability, responsiveness, and interpretability of smoothness index of gait in people with multiple sclerosis

Bergamini, Elena;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Gait impairments are common in People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). Several studies have examined the clinometric properties of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), with LDLJa identified as a robust metric for gait smoothness. However, its responsiveness and interpretability have not been explored. Methods: This cross-sectional study at IRCCS Santa Lucia Hospital enrolled 44 PwMS (age: 28-71; EDSS: 0-6) and 43 age-and gait-speed-matched healthy participants (HP). Two physiotherapists conducted assessments with five synchronized IMUs during a 10-meter walk at participants’ preferred speed. Data were collected at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks of training (T1). Results: Significant differences in log dimensionless jerk (LDLJa) were found between PwMS and HP in the AP (p < 0.001, d = 0.63), ML (p < 0.001, d = 1.08), and CC (p = 0.03, d = 0.68) directions. PwMS had lower LDLJaAP values (<-4.88) and LDLJaML values (<-5.40) with probabilities of 63% and 76%, respectively. ΔLDLJaML demonstrated good responsiveness to rehabilitation (AUC ~0.80), with improvements >4.02% representing the optimal MCID for clinical improvement in MiniBesTest. Conclusion: Lower LDLJa values in the AP and ML directions characterize gait smoothness impairment in PwMS. LDLJa in the ML direction is responsive to balance-focused rehabilitation, highlighting its potential for tracking gait disorders and rehabilitation progress.
articolo
2025
Castiglia, Stefano Filippo; Dal Farra, Fulvio; Trabassi, Dante; Turolla, Andrea; Serrao, Mariano; Nocentini, Ugo; Brasiliano, Paolo; Bergamini, Elena;...espandi
(2025). Discriminative ability, responsiveness, and interpretability of smoothness index of gait in people with multiple sclerosis [journal article - articolo]. In ARCHIVES OF PHYSIOTHERAPY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/310105
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
2025_Castiglia_ArchPhys_MS.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 1.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.42 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/310105
Citazioni
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact