For decades, the modal account of essentialism (MAE), which equates essential properties with necessary ones, has been widely accepted. However, Kit Fine’s influential work (1994) challenged this by showing that not all necessary properties are essential. Despite many attempts to salvage MAE, no satisfactory solution has emerged. This paper aims to pinpoint the problems with current modal responses to Fine and suggest a viable path forward.
(2025). What went wrong with modal responses to fine? [journal article - articolo]. In ANALYSIS. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/310605
What went wrong with modal responses to fine?
Nencha, Cristina
2025-05-19
Abstract
For decades, the modal account of essentialism (MAE), which equates essential properties with necessary ones, has been widely accepted. However, Kit Fine’s influential work (1994) challenged this by showing that not all necessary properties are essential. Despite many attempts to salvage MAE, no satisfactory solution has emerged. This paper aims to pinpoint the problems with current modal responses to Fine and suggest a viable path forward.File allegato/i alla scheda:
| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Final_Manuscript.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
postprint - versione referata/accettata senza referaggio
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
218.13 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
218.13 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo
