Radiomic analysis is highly sensitive to variations in Region of Interest (ROI) segmentation. Automatic segmentation methods based on Deep Learning (DL) can enhance radiomic reproducibility due to their high accuracy. Moreover, incorporating uncertainty quantification into these approaches can increase the trustworthiness of DL predictions, particularly when this uncertainty well captures the variability observed in expert annotations. This study aims to evaluate whether the uncertainty quantified by DL-based segmentation aligns with expert variability, and to identify the optimal configuration for maximizing radiomic features reproducibility. To this end, the Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD) approach was integrated into a U-Net model to segment lung tumors on CT images from two publicly available datasets. Tumor masks manually delineated by multiple experts were compared with masks predicted by MCD-based inferences at various confidence levels. Radiomic features were extracted from each segmentation, and reproducibility was assessed across combinations of confidence thresholds. The results indicate that the MCD approach can produce segmentations that partially reflect the variability observed in expert annotations, particularly at lower confidence thresholds. Also, radiomics remained highly sensitive to segmentation variability, with only about half of the features achieving reproducibility under the best conditions.Clinical relevance- This study supports the introduction and adoption of DL segmentation approaches and radiomic analysis in clinical practice, by increasing trustworthiness on their prediction, compared to manual delineation.

(2025). Segmentation Variability in Bayesian U-Net versus Manual Annotations: Impact on Radiomic Reproducibility in Lung Tumor CT Images . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/313827

Segmentation Variability in Bayesian U-Net versus Manual Annotations: Impact on Radiomic Reproducibility in Lung Tumor CT Images

Lanzarone, Ettore;Scalco, Elisa
2025-01-01

Abstract

Radiomic analysis is highly sensitive to variations in Region of Interest (ROI) segmentation. Automatic segmentation methods based on Deep Learning (DL) can enhance radiomic reproducibility due to their high accuracy. Moreover, incorporating uncertainty quantification into these approaches can increase the trustworthiness of DL predictions, particularly when this uncertainty well captures the variability observed in expert annotations. This study aims to evaluate whether the uncertainty quantified by DL-based segmentation aligns with expert variability, and to identify the optimal configuration for maximizing radiomic features reproducibility. To this end, the Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD) approach was integrated into a U-Net model to segment lung tumors on CT images from two publicly available datasets. Tumor masks manually delineated by multiple experts were compared with masks predicted by MCD-based inferences at various confidence levels. Radiomic features were extracted from each segmentation, and reproducibility was assessed across combinations of confidence thresholds. The results indicate that the MCD approach can produce segmentations that partially reflect the variability observed in expert annotations, particularly at lower confidence thresholds. Also, radiomics remained highly sensitive to segmentation variability, with only about half of the features achieving reproducibility under the best conditions.Clinical relevance- This study supports the introduction and adoption of DL segmentation approaches and radiomic analysis in clinical practice, by increasing trustworthiness on their prediction, compared to manual delineation.
2025
Damiano, Rossella; Merli, Alessandro; Lanzarone, Ettore; Scalco, Elisa
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Segmentation_Variability_in_Bayesian_U-Net_versus_Manual_Annotations_Impact_on_Radiomic_Reproducibility_in_Lung_Tumor_CT_Images.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 2.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.86 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/313827
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact