This article explores the legal nature, historical evolution, and constitutional implications of the oath in Italian public law, with particular reference to Article 54(2) of the Constitution. It provides a detailed classification of oaths—assertory and promissory, private and public—and highlights their symbolic, legal, and moral functions within the democratic state. Special attention is given to constitutional provisions requiring oaths (Articles 54, 91, 93, and 135), as well as the legislative developments that have implemented them across public offices, military roles, and professional functions. Through an extensive analysis of historical practices, statutory norms, and constitutional jurisprudence, the article investigates the coherence and discrepancies among various oath formulas. It questions the rationale for their diversity and addresses potential constitutional tensions, such as the requirement to swear fidelity to laws by those empowered to amend or annul them. Ultimately, the study reflects on the oath as a complex act—simultaneously legal, ethical, and performative—serving not merely to bind, but to signify a deeper allegiance to constitutional values and public responsibility.
(2025). Le formule e il dovere: il secondo comma dell’art. 54 Cost. e il giuramento nel diritto pubblico [journal article - articolo]. In AMMINISTRATIV@MENTE. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/320835
Le formule e il dovere: il secondo comma dell’art. 54 Cost. e il giuramento nel diritto pubblico
Carrer, Matteo
2025-01-01
Abstract
This article explores the legal nature, historical evolution, and constitutional implications of the oath in Italian public law, with particular reference to Article 54(2) of the Constitution. It provides a detailed classification of oaths—assertory and promissory, private and public—and highlights their symbolic, legal, and moral functions within the democratic state. Special attention is given to constitutional provisions requiring oaths (Articles 54, 91, 93, and 135), as well as the legislative developments that have implemented them across public offices, military roles, and professional functions. Through an extensive analysis of historical practices, statutory norms, and constitutional jurisprudence, the article investigates the coherence and discrepancies among various oath formulas. It questions the rationale for their diversity and addresses potential constitutional tensions, such as the requirement to swear fidelity to laws by those empowered to amend or annul them. Ultimately, the study reflects on the oath as a complex act—simultaneously legal, ethical, and performative—serving not merely to bind, but to signify a deeper allegiance to constitutional values and public responsibility.| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025 - giuramento - amministrativamente.pdf
accesso aperto
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
1.41 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.41 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

