Sociotechnical blindness refers to the inability to recognize or account for the social dimensions embedded within sociotechnical systems. In such cases, complex endeavors that inherently involve both social and technical components are instead perceived, analyzed, and approached solely as technological undertakings. This limited perspective can obscure the full range of influences shaping outcomes and decision-making. The concept of the Anthropocene, commonly used to describe the current geological era dominated by human impact, introduces a related, but distinct, kind of sociotechnical blindness. Here, the emphasis on Anthropos, or the human, often serves as a counterpoint to the idea of pristine, untouched nature. However, this human-centered focus can inadvertently obscure the technological underpinnings that are deeply woven into every aspect of human existence. In other words, while moving away from nature/human binaries, we risk ignoring the ways in which technology mediates, structures, and constitutes human life itself. To effectively respond to the profound and interconnected challenges posed by the Anthropocene, such as climate change, environmental degradation, and socio-political transformation, we need analytical frameworks and practical approaches that are explicitly aware of and responsive to these sociotechnical entanglements. Only by doing so can we develop more holistic, inclusive, and effective strategies for navigating this complex era.
(2026). Anthropocene: The Other Sociotechnical Blindness . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/325085
Anthropocene: The Other Sociotechnical Blindness
Verdicchio, Mario
2026-01-01
Abstract
Sociotechnical blindness refers to the inability to recognize or account for the social dimensions embedded within sociotechnical systems. In such cases, complex endeavors that inherently involve both social and technical components are instead perceived, analyzed, and approached solely as technological undertakings. This limited perspective can obscure the full range of influences shaping outcomes and decision-making. The concept of the Anthropocene, commonly used to describe the current geological era dominated by human impact, introduces a related, but distinct, kind of sociotechnical blindness. Here, the emphasis on Anthropos, or the human, often serves as a counterpoint to the idea of pristine, untouched nature. However, this human-centered focus can inadvertently obscure the technological underpinnings that are deeply woven into every aspect of human existence. In other words, while moving away from nature/human binaries, we risk ignoring the ways in which technology mediates, structures, and constitutes human life itself. To effectively respond to the profound and interconnected challenges posed by the Anthropocene, such as climate change, environmental degradation, and socio-political transformation, we need analytical frameworks and practical approaches that are explicitly aware of and responsive to these sociotechnical entanglements. Only by doing so can we develop more holistic, inclusive, and effective strategies for navigating this complex era.| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Verdicchio_Book_Chapter_Anth_Call.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Descrizione: Frontespizio_Indice_Capitolo_Quarta
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
3.97 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.97 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

