Spray cooling is a well-established technique for high-flux thermal management in applications ranging from metal quenching and turbine blade protection to the cooling of compact, high-power electronics [6, 5, 3]. A critical challenge in optimizing spray cooling lies in accurately modeling the transient thermal response of the substrate, especially as it passes through different boiling regimes: film boiling, transitional boiling, and nucleate boiling. This study presents a physics-informed, computationally efficient framework to simulate such transient spray cooling under a single nozzle, offering predictive insights that complement experimental investigations. The model is grounded in analytical expressions that describe the heat transfer from individual droplet impacts in each boiling regime. These expressions are sourced from validated literature and incorporate regime-specific physical mechanisms. The transition between boiling regimes is governed by temperature-based thresholds, allowing the simulation to dynamically adapt as the substrate cools. By applying the principle of superposition, the model aggregates the contribution from all impacting droplets based on their spatial and temporal number flux to calculate the instantaneous heat removal rate from the surface. A full conjugate heat transfer problem is solved using a finite difference approach, enabling time-resolved prediction of the temperature distribution within the substrate [1]. This modeling framework is further extended to evaluate the performance of Intermittent Spray Cooling (ISC), where cooling is applied in bursts rather than continuously [4]. ISC is characterized by two key parameters: duty cycle (ϕ) and cycle frequency (f). The study demonstrates that by adjusting these parameters—particularly increasing the spray-on phase duration (ton)—ISC can achieve faster and more efficient cooling than continuous spray cooling, especially in the film boiling regime where droplet-induced vapour disruption is most beneficial.
(2026). Analytical Prediction of Transient Spray Cooling [abstract]. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/328286 Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.13122/DIPSI2025_10
Analytical Prediction of Transient Spray Cooling
Marengo, M.;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Spray cooling is a well-established technique for high-flux thermal management in applications ranging from metal quenching and turbine blade protection to the cooling of compact, high-power electronics [6, 5, 3]. A critical challenge in optimizing spray cooling lies in accurately modeling the transient thermal response of the substrate, especially as it passes through different boiling regimes: film boiling, transitional boiling, and nucleate boiling. This study presents a physics-informed, computationally efficient framework to simulate such transient spray cooling under a single nozzle, offering predictive insights that complement experimental investigations. The model is grounded in analytical expressions that describe the heat transfer from individual droplet impacts in each boiling regime. These expressions are sourced from validated literature and incorporate regime-specific physical mechanisms. The transition between boiling regimes is governed by temperature-based thresholds, allowing the simulation to dynamically adapt as the substrate cools. By applying the principle of superposition, the model aggregates the contribution from all impacting droplets based on their spatial and temporal number flux to calculate the instantaneous heat removal rate from the surface. A full conjugate heat transfer problem is solved using a finite difference approach, enabling time-resolved prediction of the temperature distribution within the substrate [1]. This modeling framework is further extended to evaluate the performance of Intermittent Spray Cooling (ISC), where cooling is applied in bursts rather than continuously [4]. ISC is characterized by two key parameters: duty cycle (ϕ) and cycle frequency (f). The study demonstrates that by adjusting these parameters—particularly increasing the spray-on phase duration (ton)—ISC can achieve faster and more efficient cooling than continuous spray cooling, especially in the film boiling regime where droplet-induced vapour disruption is most beneficial.| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
P10_DIPSI2025_Banerjee_etal.pdf
accesso aperto
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
938.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
938.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

