Several studies have highlighted the significant negative impact of miscarriage on women's mental health, which can be experienced as a traumatic event, associated with symptoms such as depression, anxiety and PTSD. However, little research has explored the psychological factors that explain this impact, which involve women's emotional processes, meaning-making processes, and relationships. Women who have experienced miscarriage rarely share their experiences because of social stigma and prejudice, which can lead to feelings of isolation and unresolved grief. To inform tailored supportive psychological interventions, this study aimed to examine the predominant emotions related to miscarriage, specifically distinguishing between guilt and shame, and other related key psychological factors such as role of self disclosure, couple support, and meaning making ability. Through an online survey, we collected data from 98 Italian women with a miscarriage in their lives, investigating their emotional responses, cultural meanings and values, and disclosure behaviors related to miscarriage. A set of self-report measures on guilt and shame (TOSCA-4, PFQ2), dyadic coping strategies (DCI), perinatal grief and distress (PGS-33, PHQ-4), and meaning making (ISLES, CBI) were administered. Results showed that shame, rather than guilt, emerged as the predominant emotional response among women who experienced miscarriage and was strongly associated with reluctance to share their experiences. Greater self-disclosure was linked to lower levels of grief severity. Shame was also found to intensify grief, mainly through its role in mediating difficulties in make sense to the miscarriage event. Dyadic coping, on the other hand, was found to be a protective factor against psychological distress; in particular, supportive dyadic coping and reciprocal stress communication were significantly associated with reduced psychological distress and lower severity of perinatal bereavement. The findings highlight the complex psychological consequences of miscarriage and underscore the need for targeted psychological interventions aimed to reduce feelings of shame through emotional validation and recognition, engage partners to strengthen shared coping strategies, and facilitate meaning-making processes both individually and in couple relationships.

(2025). Understanding miscarriage grief: how shame, guilt, and meaning making influence recovery . In MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/329687

Understanding miscarriage grief: how shame, guilt, and meaning making influence recovery

Negri, Attà;Barazzetti, Arianna;Milesi, Stefano
2025-01-01

Abstract

Several studies have highlighted the significant negative impact of miscarriage on women's mental health, which can be experienced as a traumatic event, associated with symptoms such as depression, anxiety and PTSD. However, little research has explored the psychological factors that explain this impact, which involve women's emotional processes, meaning-making processes, and relationships. Women who have experienced miscarriage rarely share their experiences because of social stigma and prejudice, which can lead to feelings of isolation and unresolved grief. To inform tailored supportive psychological interventions, this study aimed to examine the predominant emotions related to miscarriage, specifically distinguishing between guilt and shame, and other related key psychological factors such as role of self disclosure, couple support, and meaning making ability. Through an online survey, we collected data from 98 Italian women with a miscarriage in their lives, investigating their emotional responses, cultural meanings and values, and disclosure behaviors related to miscarriage. A set of self-report measures on guilt and shame (TOSCA-4, PFQ2), dyadic coping strategies (DCI), perinatal grief and distress (PGS-33, PHQ-4), and meaning making (ISLES, CBI) were administered. Results showed that shame, rather than guilt, emerged as the predominant emotional response among women who experienced miscarriage and was strongly associated with reluctance to share their experiences. Greater self-disclosure was linked to lower levels of grief severity. Shame was also found to intensify grief, mainly through its role in mediating difficulties in make sense to the miscarriage event. Dyadic coping, on the other hand, was found to be a protective factor against psychological distress; in particular, supportive dyadic coping and reciprocal stress communication were significantly associated with reduced psychological distress and lower severity of perinatal bereavement. The findings highlight the complex psychological consequences of miscarriage and underscore the need for targeted psychological interventions aimed to reduce feelings of shame through emotional validation and recognition, engage partners to strengthen shared coping strategies, and facilitate meaning-making processes both individually and in couple relationships.
2025
Inglese
Proceedings of the XXV National Congress of the Italian Psychological Association, Clinical and Dynamic Section, Perugia, Italy, 17th – 20th September 2025
Mazzeschi, Claudia; Buratta, Livia; Delvecchio, Elisa; Garofalo, Carlo; Muzi, Laura; Babore, Alessandra
13
2 (Supplemento)
431
431
online
Italy
Messina
Università degli Studi di Messina
XXV National Congress of the Italian Psychological Association, Clinical and Dynamic Section, Perugia, Italy, 17th – 20th September 2025
25th
Perugia, Italy
17th – 20th September 2025
Settore PSIC-04/B - Psicologia clinica
DOI dell'intero fascicolo di abstracts: 10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-5106
Negri, Atta' Ambrogio Maria; Barazzetti, Arianna; Milesi, Stefano
open
3
1.4 Contributi in atti di convegno - Contributions in conference proceedings::1.4.02 Abstract in atti di convegno - Conference abstracts
Non definito
274
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
(2025). Understanding miscarriage grief: how shame, guilt, and meaning making influence recovery . In MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/329687
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
sysAdmin,+-20250704_ATTI_AIP_CD_2025_MJCP_10-09-2025-r2_II.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 4.41 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.41 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/329687
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact