This paper highlights the different distribution of counter-argumentative markers (CAM) in a monolingual comparable corpus made up of decisions issued in Spanish by the Spanish Supreme Court (SSC) and by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The suggested analysis intends to prove that the need for translatability and the peculiar decisionmaking process within the ECJ account for the trend towards simplification and normalisation in the Spanish judicial eurolect.

(2026). La contraargumentación del Tribunal Supremo de España y del Tribunal de Justicia de la UE: hacia una interpretación funcionalista . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/330025

La contraargumentación del Tribunal Supremo de España y del Tribunal de Justicia de la UE: hacia una interpretación funcionalista

Garofalo, Giovanni
2026-01-01

Abstract

This paper highlights the different distribution of counter-argumentative markers (CAM) in a monolingual comparable corpus made up of decisions issued in Spanish by the Spanish Supreme Court (SSC) and by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The suggested analysis intends to prove that the need for translatability and the peculiar decisionmaking process within the ECJ account for the trend towards simplification and normalisation in the Spanish judicial eurolect.
2026
Garofalo, Giovanni
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
La+contraargumentación_compressed.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 4.71 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.71 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/330025
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact