Reusing metal powder in additive manufacturing (AM) is beneficial since it is more sustainable and cost-effective. However, reusing the powder in consecutive cycles provides additional challenges due to degradation mechanisms affecting powder characteristics. This study collects, refine, and organizes fail-ures associated with powder reuse in SLM, considering articles from literature and expert interviews, for supporting Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). Through a systematic approach, the definitions of the failures are analyzed from a semantical and ontological point of view in order to identify the limitations that can undermine the risk assessment in FMEA. Finally, for each identified limitation, AI-based solutions for improving failure investigation are suggested. The findings suggest that failure investigation in AM is limited by ambiguities in failure clas-sification, intricate interdependencies, unprecise definitions, and a lack of rigor in capturing nonlinear relationships, reducing the effectiveness of conventional analysis methods. Among AI tools, machine learning, computer vision, natural language processing, Bayesian networks, and real-time monitoring systems have proven effective in addressing these challenges.
(2026). Failure Investigation of Reused Metal Powder in Additive Manufacturing: An FMEA Approach and the Role of AI-Based Support Tools . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/331088
Failure Investigation of Reused Metal Powder in Additive Manufacturing: An FMEA Approach and the Role of AI-Based Support Tools
Landi, Daniele;Spreafico, Christian
2026-01-01
Abstract
Reusing metal powder in additive manufacturing (AM) is beneficial since it is more sustainable and cost-effective. However, reusing the powder in consecutive cycles provides additional challenges due to degradation mechanisms affecting powder characteristics. This study collects, refine, and organizes fail-ures associated with powder reuse in SLM, considering articles from literature and expert interviews, for supporting Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). Through a systematic approach, the definitions of the failures are analyzed from a semantical and ontological point of view in order to identify the limitations that can undermine the risk assessment in FMEA. Finally, for each identified limitation, AI-based solutions for improving failure investigation are suggested. The findings suggest that failure investigation in AM is limited by ambiguities in failure clas-sification, intricate interdependencies, unprecise definitions, and a lack of rigor in capturing nonlinear relationships, reducing the effectiveness of conventional analysis methods. Among AI tools, machine learning, computer vision, natural language processing, Bayesian networks, and real-time monitoring systems have proven effective in addressing these challenges.| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Failure Investigation.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
2.02 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.02 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

