The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is an extensively used questionnaire to measure emotion regulation both in clinical and research practice but its length represents a limitation. This research aims to validate the Italian version of the DERS-SF (IT-DERS-SF) in a large sample from the general population. In Study 1 (N = 2222), exploratory graph analysis (EGA), was used to examine item clustering across hypothesized dimensions. In Study 2 (N = 4543), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), measurement invariance across age and gender were conducted together with a deep investigation of psychometric properties. Study 1 suggested that the EGA correctly identified the six hypothesized dimensions Study 2 showed that the DERS-SF provided good fit indexes (CFI = 0.957, RMSEA = 0.060; 90%CI[0.058, 0.063], SRMR = 0.056), it is invariant between groups, and showed good psychometric properties. Findings demonstrates the goodness of the IT-DERS-SF for research and clinical purposes, with useful normative scores provided. Fruitful implications are discussed for both methodological and clinical practice. In conclusion, the IT-DERS-SF is a brief and accurate tool suitable for inclusion in assessment batteries; it is useful to assess emotion regulation difficulties shared across several psychological difficulties, and may inform interventions to improve psychological health.

(2023). The Italian Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale – Short Form (IT-DERS-SF): A Two-step Validation Study [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/332791

The Italian Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale – Short Form (IT-DERS-SF): A Two-step Validation Study

Panzeri, A.;
2023-01-01

Abstract

The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is an extensively used questionnaire to measure emotion regulation both in clinical and research practice but its length represents a limitation. This research aims to validate the Italian version of the DERS-SF (IT-DERS-SF) in a large sample from the general population. In Study 1 (N = 2222), exploratory graph analysis (EGA), was used to examine item clustering across hypothesized dimensions. In Study 2 (N = 4543), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), measurement invariance across age and gender were conducted together with a deep investigation of psychometric properties. Study 1 suggested that the EGA correctly identified the six hypothesized dimensions Study 2 showed that the DERS-SF provided good fit indexes (CFI = 0.957, RMSEA = 0.060; 90%CI[0.058, 0.063], SRMR = 0.056), it is invariant between groups, and showed good psychometric properties. Findings demonstrates the goodness of the IT-DERS-SF for research and clinical purposes, with useful normative scores provided. Fruitful implications are discussed for both methodological and clinical practice. In conclusion, the IT-DERS-SF is a brief and accurate tool suitable for inclusion in assessment batteries; it is useful to assess emotion regulation difficulties shared across several psychological difficulties, and may inform interventions to improve psychological health.
articolo
2023
Rossi, A. A.; Panzeri, Anna; Mannarini, S.
(2023). The Italian Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale – Short Form (IT-DERS-SF): A Two-step Validation Study [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/332791
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
16_DERS-SF_IT_2023_s10862-022-10006-8.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 1.91 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.91 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/332791
Citazioni
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact