legitimate objective connected to the organisation of sport, followed by a proportionality requirement confined to what that objective needs, applies well beyond the Article 101 TFEU scope. This chapter traces how a rule, devised in 2006 to distinguish “purely sporting rules” from restrictions caught by Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, became a general method for testing whether the private regulatory power a sports governing body exercises over its members, participants or officials meets the demands of EU law.
(2026). Accountable Autonomy: the meca-medina method in FIGC and Coni, NADA Austria, CD Tondela, Rogon and RRC Sports. Judicial protection, data protection and financial governance . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/337205
Accountable Autonomy: the meca-medina method in FIGC and Coni, NADA Austria, CD Tondela, Rogon and RRC Sports. Judicial protection, data protection and financial governance
Bastianon, Stefano;
2026-01-01
Abstract
legitimate objective connected to the organisation of sport, followed by a proportionality requirement confined to what that objective needs, applies well beyond the Article 101 TFEU scope. This chapter traces how a rule, devised in 2006 to distinguish “purely sporting rules” from restrictions caught by Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, became a general method for testing whether the private regulatory power a sports governing body exercises over its members, participants or officials meets the demands of EU law.| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BULLETIN+I-2026+MECA+MEDINA_ebook+-+copyright (2).pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
1.9 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.9 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo
