Recently, a normalized version of the g-index has been proposed as an impact and concentration measure: the so-called s measure. The main problem with this measure is that —somewhat paradoxically— it may be that s=1 even in the case in which citations are perfectly evenly spread across articles. We prove that the measure s can and should be improved by a different choice of a normalizing term. This is done by defining the latter as a function of the citation count of the single most cited paper. The new index presented here does not suffer from insensitivity to citation transfers within the g-core.

Normalizing the g-index

BERTOLI BARSOTTI, Lucio
2016-02-01

Abstract

Recently, a normalized version of the g-index has been proposed as an impact and concentration measure: the so-called s measure. The main problem with this measure is that —somewhat paradoxically— it may be that s=1 even in the case in which citations are perfectly evenly spread across articles. We prove that the measure s can and should be improved by a different choice of a normalizing term. This is done by defining the latter as a function of the citation count of the single most cited paper. The new index presented here does not suffer from insensitivity to citation transfers within the g-core.
journal article - articolo
feb-2016
BERTOLI BARSOTTI, Lucio
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
art_10.1007_s11192-015-1794-0.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 333.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
333.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/49888
Citazioni
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact