This research aims at studying in a discursive perspective the comments following a selection of Youtube videos about the French philosopher Michel Onfray. The discursive practices of Youtube users are defined as belonging to the genre of online public debate. The theoretic frame of our research is on the one hand that of socio-pragmatic analysis of verbal interactions and relational sociology and on the other hand that of persuasion-based theories of argumentation. Flaming on Youtube, which is a characteristic feature of exchanges for the discursive community we have studied, is defined as a form of polemical discourse. The problematic nature of polemical arguments for politeness theories and face-work is also taken into consideration. After offering a sum up of the marks of verbal and polemic violence that we have found in our corpus, we study some examples which allow us to show some of the interactional and argumentative dynamics which characterize polemic exchanges in this Youtube community. We conclude that flaming is quite a normative discursive behaviour on Youtube and we advance some hypothesis for future research.

(2012). Le débat d'idées en ligne : formes de la violence polémique sur Youtube [journal article - articolo]. In SIGNES, DISCOURS ET SOCIÉTÉS. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/146861

Le débat d'idées en ligne : formes de la violence polémique sur Youtube

Amadori, Sara
2012-01-01

Abstract

This research aims at studying in a discursive perspective the comments following a selection of Youtube videos about the French philosopher Michel Onfray. The discursive practices of Youtube users are defined as belonging to the genre of online public debate. The theoretic frame of our research is on the one hand that of socio-pragmatic analysis of verbal interactions and relational sociology and on the other hand that of persuasion-based theories of argumentation. Flaming on Youtube, which is a characteristic feature of exchanges for the discursive community we have studied, is defined as a form of polemical discourse. The problematic nature of polemical arguments for politeness theories and face-work is also taken into consideration. After offering a sum up of the marks of verbal and polemic violence that we have found in our corpus, we study some examples which allow us to show some of the interactional and argumentative dynamics which characterize polemic exchanges in this Youtube community. We conclude that flaming is quite a normative discursive behaviour on Youtube and we advance some hypothesis for future research.
articolo
2012
Cette étude propose une analyse discursive des commentaires suivant une sélection de vidéos de Youtube concernant Michel Onfray. Les pratiques discursives des internautes, qui relèvent du genre du débat public en ligne, sont étudiées d'une part dans le cadre de l'analyse sociopragmatique des interactions verbales et de la sociologie relationnelle et, d'autre part, en s'appuyant sur les théories de l'argumentation basées sur l’orientation vers un objectif de persuasion. Le « flaming » sur Youtube, qui caractérise les échanges de la communauté discursive considérée, est envisagé dans une perspective argumentative et redéfini comme relevant du discours polémique. La nature problématique des argumentations polémiques pour les théories de la politesse et le ménagement des faces des internautes est également prise en compte. Après avoir décrit de façon synthétique les marques de la violence verbale et de la violence polémique que nous avons relevées dans notre corpus, nous exemplifions les dynamiques interactionnelles et argumentatives qui caractérisent les échanges polémiques des membres de cette communauté discursive de Youtube. Nous concluons ainsi qu'il existe un éthos du polémiste ressenti comme standard par les internautes, et présentons quelques perspectives de recherche future.
Amadori, Sara
(2012). Le débat d'idées en ligne : formes de la violence polémique sur Youtube [journal article - articolo]. In SIGNES, DISCOURS ET SOCIÉTÉS. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/146861
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Le débat d'idées en ligne.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 137.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
137.53 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
9. La force des mots - couverte.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 110.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
110.9 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/146861
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact