Different words, numeric values or semiotic registers, figures, graphs or tables, namely elements of item formulation, affect students’ probability of encountering an item correctly. An experimental study was carried out to compare different formulations and their effect for validating a comparative technique: students’ answers were equated within the framework of the Rasch analysis to make them directly comparable on the same scale and then analyzed and compared to each other. Four anchored math achievement tests were administered to a sample of 1647 students attending grade 8. In particular, we used different formulations of the same items to explore students’ misconception about the relationship between perimeter and area. Results confirmed that item formulation channels students’ solving strategy and thus modifies the probability of a correct answer more than item content. This quantitative technique combined in a mixed-method approach with qualitative analysis may provide useful didactical issues.

(2018). How much item formulations affect the probability of a correct answer? An experimental study . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/153056

How much item formulations affect the probability of a correct answer? An experimental study

Giberti, Chiara
2018-01-01

Abstract

Different words, numeric values or semiotic registers, figures, graphs or tables, namely elements of item formulation, affect students’ probability of encountering an item correctly. An experimental study was carried out to compare different formulations and their effect for validating a comparative technique: students’ answers were equated within the framework of the Rasch analysis to make them directly comparable on the same scale and then analyzed and compared to each other. Four anchored math achievement tests were administered to a sample of 1647 students attending grade 8. In particular, we used different formulations of the same items to explore students’ misconception about the relationship between perimeter and area. Results confirmed that item formulation channels students’ solving strategy and thus modifies the probability of a correct answer more than item content. This quantitative technique combined in a mixed-method approach with qualitative analysis may provide useful didactical issues.
2018
Bolondi, Giorgio; Cascella, Clelia; Giberti, Chiara
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
8_BolondiCascellaGiberti_BSRLM.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 412.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
412.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/153056
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact