This research is aimed at catching a glimpse of the student teacher's practical training throughout the apprenticeship for primary education teaching; in particular, it scrutinises the ongoing mentoring relationship between the experienced teacher and the trainee, focusing on that type of knowledge upheld by the experienced teacher to clarify the practice and the means of communication used in the process. In such pursuit, we chose a survey method - called testimonial confrontation-through which the researcher ,respectively, asks the mentor to recreate the process by which he or she succeeded in explaining the difficulties encountered by the student during the latter's training process (a), and asks the student teacher to reconstruct the process by which the mentor succeeded in clarifying the same difficulties (b). After introducing the stages of the aforementioned method and contemplating some of the reflection cues on a personalistic- orientated, educational communication, this article will then analyse the mentor's 'perspective' pinpointing the reconstructions performed. On an initial analysis of the hermeneutical interviews transcripts as obtained from 4 mentors of the Science of Primary Education degree course (Diana - Montesperelli 2009), it appears that the mentor very often draws upon his or her repertory of professional, personal and illustrative cases (Gauthier, 1997) in order to explicate the student's quandaries, resorting in most occasions to an unspecialised language. On the basis of these first impressions, it is possible to establish a link with the score-keeper construct, elaborated by R. Brandom, within a theoretical stage (Brandom, 1994). The work will end with the introduction of the second stage of the method which, through the 'student's perspective' (Gemma 2009), on the one hand, will bear repercussions on the type of knowledge reported by the mentor (what), and, on the other, will make it possible to understand his or her means of communication (how prosody - Silverman 1993; the register - Sombero and Miglietta, 2006; the non-verbal).
(2010). Supporting through Words and Gestures: a Comparison of Mentor and Student-Teacher [journal article - articolo]. In THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNING. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/256732
Supporting through Words and Gestures: a Comparison of Mentor and Student-Teacher
Agrati, Laura Sara;
2010-01-01
Abstract
This research is aimed at catching a glimpse of the student teacher's practical training throughout the apprenticeship for primary education teaching; in particular, it scrutinises the ongoing mentoring relationship between the experienced teacher and the trainee, focusing on that type of knowledge upheld by the experienced teacher to clarify the practice and the means of communication used in the process. In such pursuit, we chose a survey method - called testimonial confrontation-through which the researcher ,respectively, asks the mentor to recreate the process by which he or she succeeded in explaining the difficulties encountered by the student during the latter's training process (a), and asks the student teacher to reconstruct the process by which the mentor succeeded in clarifying the same difficulties (b). After introducing the stages of the aforementioned method and contemplating some of the reflection cues on a personalistic- orientated, educational communication, this article will then analyse the mentor's 'perspective' pinpointing the reconstructions performed. On an initial analysis of the hermeneutical interviews transcripts as obtained from 4 mentors of the Science of Primary Education degree course (Diana - Montesperelli 2009), it appears that the mentor very often draws upon his or her repertory of professional, personal and illustrative cases (Gauthier, 1997) in order to explicate the student's quandaries, resorting in most occasions to an unspecialised language. On the basis of these first impressions, it is possible to establish a link with the score-keeper construct, elaborated by R. Brandom, within a theoretical stage (Brandom, 1994). The work will end with the introduction of the second stage of the method which, through the 'student's perspective' (Gemma 2009), on the one hand, will bear repercussions on the type of knowledge reported by the mentor (what), and, on the other, will make it possible to understand his or her means of communication (how prosody - Silverman 1993; the register - Sombero and Miglietta, 2006; the non-verbal).File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Agrati_2010.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
397.47 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
397.47 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo