The spread of disinformation and hate speech about abortion on social media platforms has been triggered by recent normative developments that have led to increased discussions. The aim of this chapter is to automatically identify: (a) disinformation based on content correctness vs. fake news and (b) polarisation of attitudes based on discourse labels. However, when attempting to instruct an AI to detect disinformation related to the abortion debate on Twitter in a period from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022, it was found that the instruction could never be objective due to an ideological bias of the researchers. Nevertheless, expressions of hate speech can be found in the context of vilification: The preliminary results show that the more polarised the discourse, the more the group is misrepresented.

(2023). “It’s never about #ProLife, it’s about punishment, hate, and religious repression”. Polarising discourses and disinformation in the abortion debate on Twitter . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/259650

“It’s never about #ProLife, it’s about punishment, hate, and religious repression”. Polarising discourses and disinformation in the abortion debate on Twitter

Maci, Stefania Maria;Abbiati, Simone
2023-01-01

Abstract

The spread of disinformation and hate speech about abortion on social media platforms has been triggered by recent normative developments that have led to increased discussions. The aim of this chapter is to automatically identify: (a) disinformation based on content correctness vs. fake news and (b) polarisation of attitudes based on discourse labels. However, when attempting to instruct an AI to detect disinformation related to the abortion debate on Twitter in a period from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022, it was found that the instruction could never be objective due to an ideological bias of the researchers. Nevertheless, expressions of hate speech can be found in the context of vilification: The preliminary results show that the more polarised the discourse, the more the group is misrepresented.
scientifica
Inglese
2023
The Routledge Handbook of Discourse and Disinformation
Maci, Stefania Maria; Demata, Massimiliano; McGlashan, Mark; Seargeant, Philip
cartaceo
online
9781032124254
131
152
United Kingdom
Abingdon
Routledge
esperti anonimi
Settore L-LIN/12 - Lingua e Traduzione - Lingua Inglese
fake news discourse; abortion; automatic detection; Corpus linguistics; discourse polarization
indice consultabile alla pagina https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-Discourse-and-Disinformation/Maci-Demata-McGlashan-Seargeant/p/book/9781032124254 anno di riferimento 2024
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
(2023). “It’s never about #ProLife, it’s about punishment, hate, and religious repression”. Polarising discourses and disinformation in the abortion debate on Twitter . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/259650
reserved
1.2 Contributi in volume - Book chapters::1.2.01 Contributi in volume (Capitoli o Saggi) - Book Chapters/Essays
Non definito
Maci, Stefania Maria; Abbiati, Simone
2
268
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Maci_Abbiati_Abortion_Chpt9.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 749.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
749.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/259650
Citazioni
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact