This paper investigates the use of general and specific extenders in legislative texts across three languages—Italian, Russian, and German—focusing on intellectual property law. Through a contrastive, corpus-based analysis, the study examines their frequency, structure, and degrees of modification. Particular attention is given to specific extenders, which emerge as key tools for managing vagueness. The findings suggest that extenders contribute to the balance between precision and flexibility in normative writing, revealing cross-linguistic patterns and strategies that reflect the functional needs of legal discourse.
(2025). Strategies of Indeterminacy in Legal Discourse: A Contrastive Analysis (Italian-Russian-German) [journal article - articolo]. In PRIMENJENA LINGVISTIKA. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/317465
Strategies of Indeterminacy in Legal Discourse: A Contrastive Analysis (Italian-Russian-German)
Marchesi, Chiara;Caprioli, Francesco
2025-01-01
Abstract
This paper investigates the use of general and specific extenders in legislative texts across three languages—Italian, Russian, and German—focusing on intellectual property law. Through a contrastive, corpus-based analysis, the study examines their frequency, structure, and degrees of modification. Particular attention is given to specific extenders, which emerge as key tools for managing vagueness. The findings suggest that extenders contribute to the balance between precision and flexibility in normative writing, revealing cross-linguistic patterns and strategies that reflect the functional needs of legal discourse.| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Marchesi Caprioli primling.pdf
accesso aperto
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
471.93 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
471.93 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

