Aging in Place (AIP) — the desire to remain in one's own home and community — has become an essential focus in aging studies, reflecting the preference of older adults, and also the fundamental role of the home in supporting societal welfare. This study frames AIP not merely as physical permanence but as a relational, situated, and meaningful experience for older adults. Adopting a qualitative approach, the research explores the lived experiences of 49 participants (aged 64–97) across three different AIP models: a senior residence with integrated services, a senior house with a healthcare focus, and independent living in private homes. Using semi-structured interviews and a bottom-up Thematic Analysis enriched by quantitative coding data, the study investigates the delicate balance between practical needs, emotional attachment, and personal autonomy in the decision to age in place. Findings reveal the complex interplay between psychological and practical dimensions, illustrating how older adults navigate housing selection by managing needs for support and independence The study calls for an ecological and situated approach to understanding AIP, emphasizing the need to view aging as a mutual responsibility between the individual and the environment. It recognizes aging not only as a biological fact, but as a relational and embodied process, deeply shaped by the affordances the environment is able—or unable—to offer. The research offers insights for housing policies and urban planning, highlighting the importance of empowered aging, recognition of individual subjectivity, relationships, and the promotion of autonomy for AIP sustainability.
Aging in place and housing selection: A qualitative analysis of the key determinants that shape later life living models
Butti S.;Garda E.;Gattuso M.;Laureano Benincá;Morganti F.
Abstract
Aging in Place (AIP) — the desire to remain in one's own home and community — has become an essential focus in aging studies, reflecting the preference of older adults, and also the fundamental role of the home in supporting societal welfare. This study frames AIP not merely as physical permanence but as a relational, situated, and meaningful experience for older adults. Adopting a qualitative approach, the research explores the lived experiences of 49 participants (aged 64–97) across three different AIP models: a senior residence with integrated services, a senior house with a healthcare focus, and independent living in private homes. Using semi-structured interviews and a bottom-up Thematic Analysis enriched by quantitative coding data, the study investigates the delicate balance between practical needs, emotional attachment, and personal autonomy in the decision to age in place. Findings reveal the complex interplay between psychological and practical dimensions, illustrating how older adults navigate housing selection by managing needs for support and independence The study calls for an ecological and situated approach to understanding AIP, emphasizing the need to view aging as a mutual responsibility between the individual and the environment. It recognizes aging not only as a biological fact, but as a relational and embodied process, deeply shaped by the affordances the environment is able—or unable—to offer. The research offers insights for housing policies and urban planning, highlighting the importance of empowered aging, recognition of individual subjectivity, relationships, and the promotion of autonomy for AIP sustainability.Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

